![]() CMs allow themselves mocking comments like "win" in regard to the questions like "What should I do on Me.262 versus far more advanced post-war jets" or "just donate" and etc. All those talks about forum dictatorship are true - even objective criticism is not welcome there. But things change and War Thunder has gone the bad way: - 1. It all started out good with War Thunder - we could see nice graphics and sounds, devs chatting about how they're going the realism way unlike It all started out good with War Thunder - we could see nice graphics and sounds, devs chatting about how they're going the realism way unlike World Of Potato products plus having planes, tanks and ships in one single client instead of the aforementioned World Of Potato division into three different games. I therefore give it a solid 3 out of ten and the graphics are very nice. It is about 33% of what I would like to see. The Gaijin company is a very poor company with a bad attitude towards its customers. ![]() I asked the developers when they are finished with the beta and was told that War Thunder is a perpetual beta. ![]() You are outmatched by their mouse aim system, that is accurate but wobbles all over if played in Historical Battles. If you like to play with a joystick don't get this game. There is nothing historical about it as they claim you end up in a battle with a Spitfire MkI in the Korean war fighting Russian pilots and planes. It is a terrible simulation and a poor game. So I gave these people a good chunk of money thinking that it is a good simulation. So I gave these people a good I was mislead in thinking that this game was a simulation when I read it won a 'simulation of the year' award. I was mislead in thinking that this game was a simulation when I read it won a 'simulation of the year' award.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |